From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernea v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 5, 2014
NO. 03-09-00566-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2014)

Summary

declining to apply Sandefer test and applying Frank test

Summary of this case from Davis v. MSR Holdings, LLC

Opinion

NO. 03-09-00566-CV

11-05-2014

David Fernea, Appellant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc., Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 200TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-09-002195, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed a "Joint Motion to Vacate Judgment, Withdraw Opinion, and Dismiss Appeal," representing that they have settled the claims at issue and no longer wish to pursue this appeal. They request that we grant their motion, vacate our judgment dated July 12, 2011, withdraw our opinion dated July 12, 2011, and dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). We grant the parties' motion in part, specifically we withdraw our judgment dated July 12, 2011 and dismiss the appeal. However, we deny their request to withdraw our July 12, 2011, opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(c).

/s/_________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Pemberton Dismissed on Appellant's Motion Filed: November 5, 2014


Summaries of

Fernea v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Nov 5, 2014
NO. 03-09-00566-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2014)

declining to apply Sandefer test and applying Frank test

Summary of this case from Davis v. MSR Holdings, LLC
Case details for

Fernea v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:David Fernea, Appellant v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.…

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-09-00566-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 5, 2014)

Citing Cases

Wheeler v. Free

This nexus requirement is an element of foreseeability, and foreseeability is an essential component of both…

Rosas v. Vela

While the employee need not be acting in the scope of his employment to impose liability on the employer, the…