From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 14, 2022
No. 17883-21S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 14, 2022)

Opinion

17883-21S

10-14-2022

RICARDO FERNANDEZ & MARGARITA CASTRO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

Diana L. Leyden, Special Trial Judge.

This case was set on the calendar for the remote Trial Session of the Court at San Francisco, California, and was called from the calendar on October 11, 2022. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the petitioners. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. Counsel for Respondent orally moved for Entry of Decision consistent with parties previous filed settlement. After due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is

ORDERED that respondent's oral Motion for Entry of Decision is granted. It is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is a deficiency in Federal income tax due from the petitioners for the taxable year 2018 in the amount of $26,453.00; and

That there is not any accuracy-related penalty due from petitioners for the taxable year 2018 under the provisions of I.R.C. § 6662(a).


Summaries of

Fernandez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Oct 14, 2022
No. 17883-21S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Fernandez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:RICARDO FERNANDEZ & MARGARITA CASTRO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Oct 14, 2022

Citations

No. 17883-21S (U.S.T.C. Oct. 14, 2022)