From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2000
272 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 4, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lottie Wilkins, J.), entered on or about June 11, 1999, which, in this negligence action to recover for personal injuries, inter alia, granted plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against defendant-appellant Benny's Express, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Charles H. Dobkin, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Elizabeth Anne Bannon, for Defendant-Appellant.

SULLIVAN, P.J., NARDELLI, TOM, WALLACH, LERNER, JJ.


Defendant-appellant, in response to plaintiff's prima facie showing that his injuries were caused by the negligent operation of a "hi-lo" vehicle by defendant's employee, failed to present evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue as to its liability. Indeed, defendant-appellant's sole submission in opposition to plaintiff's summary judgment motion was an affirmation by its attorney, who had no personal knowledge of the facts. Accordingly, plaintiff's cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against defendant-appellant was properly granted (see, C.P.L.R 3212 N.Y.CPLR[b]; Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557; Perez v. Brux Cab Corp., 251 A.D.2d 157; Namisnak v. Martin, 244 A.D.2d 258).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Fernandez v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 4, 2000
272 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Fernandez v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:WILFREDO FERNANDEZ, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 4, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 834

Citing Cases

Quinones v. Caballero

Defendants admit, through the Caballero defendants' attorney, that their insurer retained DD Associates to…

Moskowitz v. Barocco Foods, Inc.

Her attempt to lay the foundation for these documents' admissibility and her conclusions about their…