From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez v. Arulas, Inc.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 2, 2018
NO. 01-18-00048-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 01-18-00048-CV

08-02-2018

GEORGE FERNANDEZ, Appellant v. ARULAS, INC. FORMERLY KNOWN AS HOUSTON SHIP REPAIR, INC., Appellee


On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 1087993

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, George Fernandez, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk's record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). Appellee subsequently filed a motion to dismiss for want of prosecution. More than ten days have elapsed since the filing of the motion and appellant has not responded. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a). Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Brown, and Caughey.


Summaries of

Fernandez v. Arulas, Inc.

Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas
Aug 2, 2018
NO. 01-18-00048-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Fernandez v. Arulas, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE FERNANDEZ, Appellant v. ARULAS, INC. FORMERLY KNOWN AS HOUSTON SHIP…

Court:Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas

Date published: Aug 2, 2018

Citations

NO. 01-18-00048-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 2, 2018)