From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fernandez-Garcia v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 2, 2014
574 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-6022

06-02-2014

MARTHA CECILIA FERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Martha Cecilia Fernandez-Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01137-TDS-JLW) Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Martha Cecilia Fernandez-Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Martha Cecilia Fernandez-Garcia appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying her petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garcia v. United States, No. 1-12-cv-01137-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Fernandez-Garcia v. United States

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 2, 2014
574 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Fernandez-Garcia v. United States

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA CECILIA FERNANDEZ-GARCIA, Petitioner - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 2, 2014

Citations

574 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

United States v. Davis

First, he does not offer a reason why he could not have attacked his convictions earlier. See United States…