From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Oct 25, 2013
Case No. 5D12-4662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 5D12-4662

10-25-2013

WILLIAM FERGUSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

William Ferguson, Bristol, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit
Court for Lake County,
Lawrence J. Semento, Judge.
William Ferguson, Bristol, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General,
Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton,
Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach,
for Appellee.
COHEN, J.

William Ferguson appeals from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Ferguson was convicted of numerous sex offenses against his stepchildren. His rule 3.850 motion raised seven claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court summarily denied six of those claims and denied the remaining claim following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the trial court's denial of claims one, two, three, five, six, and seven. However, we reverse the trial court's summary denial of Ferguson's fourth claim regarding trial counsel's failure to request a jury instruction on the lesser-included offense of unnatural and lascivious act. We remand for an evidentiary hearing on that claim.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. PALMER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Oct 25, 2013
Case No. 5D12-4662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Ferguson v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM FERGUSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Oct 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 5D12-4662 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Oct. 25, 2013)