From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Payne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 5, 1952
279 App. Div. 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

March 5, 1952.

Present — Taylor, P.J., McCurn, Vaughan, Kimball and Wheeler, JJ.


Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, and complaint dismissed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: We think under the evidence in this case that it was error to deny the defendant's motion for a nonsuit. In our view, no negligence is established by reason of the defendant's failure to establish rules for the playground (see Hoose v. Drumm, 281 N.Y. 54; Peterson v. City of New York, 267 N.Y. 204). Moreover, the evidence here does not establish that failure to adopt rules is the proximate cause of the accident. We conclude, also, that the record contains no evidence upon which a jury might properly find that the playground was maintained in a negligent or dangerous condition. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in a negligence action. One order denies defendant's motion for a new trial; one order denies a motion to dismiss.)


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Payne

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 5, 1952
279 App. Div. 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Payne

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS FERGUSON, an Infant, by CHARLES FERGUSON, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1952

Citations

279 App. Div. 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Citing Cases

Coulter v. Roman Catholic Ch. of St. Ignatius

Their proof showed no defective equipment, similar accident, lack of supervision, or notice of the presence…