From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 22, 2024
5:23-1737-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-1737-AGR

02-22-2024

MICHELLE ANTOINETTE FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY,[1] Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

LAW OFFICES OF BILL LATOUR JESSICA WARREN


LAW OFFICES OF BILL LATOUR JESSICA WARREN

PROPOSED ORDER AWARDING EAJA ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d)

HON. ALICIA G. ROSENBERG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Based upon the parties' Joint Motion for Award of EAJA Fees (“Stipulation”), IT IS ORDERED that EAJA attorney fees are awarded in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($4,500.00) and zero costs ($0.00), subject to the terms of the stipulation.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 22, 2024
5:23-1737-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Ferguson v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:MICHELLE ANTOINETTE FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY,[1…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

5:23-1737-AGR (C.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)