From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 6, 2014
120 A.D.3d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-08-6

In the Matter of Kathryn L. FERGUSON, appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS, et al., respondents.

Robert S. Powers, North Babylon, N.Y., for appellant. Jackson Lewis, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Kathryn J. Russo of counsel), for respondent Long Island Home, doing business as South Oaks Hospital.


Robert S. Powers, North Babylon, N.Y., for appellant. Jackson Lewis, LLP, Melville, N.Y. (Kathryn J. Russo of counsel), for respondent Long Island Home, doing business as South Oaks Hospital.

In a proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated November 16, 2011, which dismissed the petitioner's administrative complaint, upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent Long Island Home, doing business as South Oaks Hospital, engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Garguilo, J.), entered August 8, 2012, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

After an investigation, the New York State Division of Human Rights determined that there was no probable cause to believe that the respondent Long Island Home, doing business as South Oaks Hospital, had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices with respect to its treatment of the petitioner. In reviewing that determination, the Supreme Court properly concluded that it was not arbitrary and capricious or lacking a rational basis in the record ( see Matter of Romain v. State Div. of Human Rights, 103 A.D.3d 730, 730, 962 N.Y.S.2d 159;Matter of Maltsev v. New York State Div. of Human Rights, 31 A.D.3d 641, 641, 817 N.Y.S.2d 906). Accordingly, the court properly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding ( see Matter of Romain v. State Div. of Human Rights, 103 A.D.3d at 730, 962 N.Y.S.2d 159). BALKIN, J.P., AUSTIN, LaSALLE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 6, 2014
120 A.D.3d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Ferguson v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Kathryn L. FERGUSON, appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 6, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 497 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5641
989 N.Y.S.2d 907

Citing Cases

Carlino v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights

Moreover, the SDHR "has broad discretion in determining the method to be employed in investigating a claim,…