From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2000
273 A.D.2d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

June 6, 2000.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered May 21, 1999, which, in an action to impose a constructive trust, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Todd David Lawlor, for plaintiff-respondent.

Stuart Klein, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Lerner, Friedman, JJ.


The motion was properly denied in light of plaintiff's deposition testimony and affidavit describing the parties' long-term relationship and long-range plans, including, in particular, plaintiff's contributions in procuring and renovating the London apartment resulting in the profits that she asserts enabled defendant to purchase the New York apartment in which she claims an interest (see, Sharp v. Kosmalski, 40 N.Y.2d 119; Lester v. Zimmer, 147 A.D.2d 340; Palazzo v. Palazzo, 121 A.D.2d 261).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 6, 2000
273 A.D.2d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:EMER FERGUSON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK MURPHY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 6, 2000

Citations

273 A.D.2d 34 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 866

Citing Cases

Braddock v. Braddock

The cause of action for imposition of a constructive trust is based upon John's claimed right to the…