From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. McLoughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 1993
198 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 23, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.).


The real property owned by the parties as tenants in common was sold by a court-appointed Referee at public auction in accordance with the clear terms of an interlocutory judgment of partition and sale previously reviewed and affirmed by this Court ( 184 A.D.2d 294, appeal dismissed 80 N.Y.2d 972). There is no merit to the claim that the Referee improperly rejected her bid without considering additional funds to be made available to her. In the absence of oppressive or unfair conduct, a judicial sale otherwise properly conducted should not be set aside (Guardian Loan Co. v Early, 47 N.Y.2d 515, 520-521). There was no such conduct in this sale.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Carro, Ellerin and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. McLoughlin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 23, 1993
198 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Ferguson v. McLoughlin

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW J. FERGUSON et al., Respondents, v. KATHLEEN B. McLOUGHLIN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 23, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 161 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 481

Citing Cases

Tambasco v. Pesce

The terms of sale clearly grant the Referee discretion to extend the time for the completion of the…

Gapihan v. Hemmings

Although Supreme Court provided that the referee could give the purchaser up to 60 days to tender the full…