From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. McClellan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Feb 8, 2016
1:15CV865 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2016)

Opinion

1:15CV865

02-08-2016

JOSEPH STANTON FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. MR. MCCLELLAN, et al., Defendant(s).


JUDGMENT

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and on January 11, 2016 was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 3, 4.) No objections were filed within the time prescribed by § 636.

The court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action be filed and DISMISSED sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint, on the proper § 1983 forms, which corrects the defects cited in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

This, the 8th day of February, 2016.

/s/ Loretta C. Biggs

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ferguson v. McClellan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Feb 8, 2016
1:15CV865 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Ferguson v. McClellan

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH STANTON FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. MR. MCCLELLAN, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 8, 2016

Citations

1:15CV865 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 2016)