From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

FERGUSON v. LAM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 2009
59 A.D.3d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

Nos. 2007-09112, 2007-11335.

February 3, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schulman, J.), dated December 22, 2006, which granted the motion of the defendant 104-50 48th Avenue Corp. to vacate a judgment entered March 31, 2005 upon its default in answering the complaint, which was in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $601,700.

Hayes Mensching (Gilroy Downes Horowitz Goldstein, New York, N.Y. [James Gilroy, Thomas Dillon, and Michael Horowitz], of counsel), for defendants third-party defendants-appellants.

Sanders, Sanders, Block, Woycik, Viener Grossman, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Mark R. Bernstein of counsel), for plaintiff-respondent.

Ira Levine, Great Neck, N.Y., for defendant third-party plaintiff-respondent.

Before: Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Florio and Leventhal, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant 104-50 48th Avenue Corp. (hereinafter 48 Corp) to vacate the judgment entered upon its default in answering the complaint. While the failure of 48 Corp to keep a current address on file with the Secretary of State did not constitute a reasonable excuse to vacate its default under CPLR 5015 (a), it was still entitled to vacatur under CPLR 317, which does not require a defendant to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for its default. CPLR 317 permits a defendant who has been "served with a summons other than by personal delivery" to seek relief from a default upon a showing that it did not receive actual notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense ( see Fatima v Twenty Seven-Twenty Four Realty Corp., 53 AD3d 564; Thakurdyal v 341 Scholes St., LLC, 50 AD3d 889, 889-890; Franklin v 172 Aububon Corp., 32 AD3d 454). Here, the affidavit of the president of 48 Corp and the weather report submitted by it set forth sufficient facts to warrant relief from its default under CPLR 317.


Summaries of

FERGUSON v. LAM

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 2009
59 A.D.3d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

FERGUSON v. LAM

Case Details

Full title:BETH ANNA FERGUSON, Appellant, v. SHU HAM LAM et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 646
872 N.Y.S.2d 529

Citing Cases

Akkoc v. 12-14 E. 37th Development Corp.

Nevertheless, since C.P.L.R. § 317, in contrast to C.P.L.R. § 5015(a), does not require a reasonable excuse…

Tan v. AB Capstone Dev., LLC

With respect to AB Capstone, under the circumstances of this case, its failure to keep a current address on…