From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 13, 2017
Civil No. 1:15cv261-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Nov. 13, 2017)

Opinion

Civil No. 1:15cv261-HSO-RHW

11-13-2017

JAMES M. FERGUSON PETITIONER v. MARSHALL FISHER RESPONDENT


FINAL JUDGMENT

This matter came on to be heard on the Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [20] of Magistrate Judge Robert H. Walker, entered in this civil action on April 27, 2017. The Court, after a full review and consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings of Fact and Recommendation [20], the record as a whole, and relevant legal authority, finds that in accord with its Order entered herewith,

IT IS, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that this civil action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, this the 13th day of November, 2017.

/s/_________

HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Fisher

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 13, 2017
Civil No. 1:15cv261-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Nov. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:JAMES M. FERGUSON PETITIONER v. MARSHALL FISHER RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 13, 2017

Citations

Civil No. 1:15cv261-HSO-RHW (S.D. Miss. Nov. 13, 2017)