From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. DiGuglielmo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 21, 2019
Civil Action No. 09 - 72E (W.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2019)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09 - 72E

10-21-2019

ANTONIO D. FERGUSON, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ERIE, BRADLEY H. FOULK, Respondents.



Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan MEMORANDUM ORDER

Pending before the Court is a Motion for Relief from Judgment filed by Petitioner on July 30, 2019. (ECF No. 49.) Petitioner seeks relief pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and requests that this Court vacate its Order dated August 5, 2010, which denied his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and either grant him habeas relief or afford him an evidentiary hearing. The Motion was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.C and 72.D of the Local Rules of Court.

On September 23, 2019, Judge Lenihan issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), which recommended that Petitioner's Motion be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 52.) Specifically, she concluded that Petitioner's Motion was really an impermissible second or successive habeas petition that he had not received permission to file. The R&R was served on the parties and Petitioner filed timely objections that were docketed October 8, 2019. (ECF No. 54.) However, after careful review, the Court finds that Petitioner's objections do not undermine the R&R's recommended disposition. Accordingly, the Court enters the following Order:

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2019;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 49) is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the R&R (ECF No. 52) is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case closed.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Petitioner has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

s/ David S. Cercone

David S. Cercone

United States District Judge Cc: Antonio D. Ferguson

GB-8731

SCI Phoenix

1200 Mokychic Drive

Collegeville, PA 19426

Counsel for Respondents

(Via CM/ECF electronic mail)


Summaries of

Ferguson v. DiGuglielmo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Oct 21, 2019
Civil Action No. 09 - 72E (W.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2019)
Case details for

Ferguson v. DiGuglielmo

Case Details

Full title:ANTONIO D. FERGUSON, Petitioner, v. SUPERINTENDENT DAVID DIGUGLIELMO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Oct 21, 2019

Citations

Civil Action No. 09 - 72E (W.D. Pa. Oct. 21, 2019)