From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Cole

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 14, 2011
9:09-CV-549 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2011)

Opinion

9:09-CV-549.

February 14, 2011

WESELY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, Pro Se, 05-A-1183, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Coxsackie, NY.

ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ., Asst. Attorney General, HON. ANDREW M. CUOMO, Attorney General of the State of New York, Attorney for Defendants, Department of Law, The Capitol, Albany, New York.

DECISION and ORDER



Plaintiff, Gregory Ferguson, commenced this civil rights action in May 2009, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated January 24, 2011, the Honorable Randolph F. Treece, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 21) be granted and that the entire case be dismissed. The plaintiff has filed objections to the report-recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review of the entire file, including the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which plaintiff has objected, and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge Treece, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 21) is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff's complaint in the above matter is DISMISSED in all respects; and

3. The Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 10, 2011

Utica, New York.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Cole

United States District Court, N.D. New York
Feb 14, 2011
9:09-CV-549 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. COLE, Correctional Officer, Auburn…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. New York

Date published: Feb 14, 2011

Citations

9:09-CV-549 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 14, 2011)