From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. CCDC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 21, 2012
2:12-cv-01894-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2012)

Opinion

2:12-cv-01894-RCJ-VCF

11-21-2012

ANGELO FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. CCDC, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has filed a civil rights complaint. Neither a filing fee nor an application to proceed in forma pauperis was received with the complaint. It does not appear from the allegations and documents presented that a promptly filed new action would be time-barred under the applicable two-year statute of limitations.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a new properly commenced action under a new docket number with either the required filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.

The Clerk shall send plaintiff two copies each of a pauper form for prisoner and a blank Section 1983 complaint form, along with the instructions for each form and a copy of the papers that he submitted.

The Clerk shall enter final judgment accordingly, dismissing this action without prejudice..

____________________

ROBERT C. JONES

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Ferguson v. CCDC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Nov 21, 2012
2:12-cv-01894-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2012)
Case details for

Ferguson v. CCDC

Case Details

Full title:ANGELO FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. CCDC, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Nov 21, 2012

Citations

2:12-cv-01894-RCJ-VCF (D. Nev. Nov. 21, 2012)