From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Brown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2007
2:05-cv-1340-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2007)

Opinion

2:05-cv-1340-GEB-JFM-P.

February 23, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 29, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations and defendants have filed a response to plaintiff's objections.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 29, 2007 are adopted in full;

2. Defendants' August 18, 2006 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to suit.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Brown

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 23, 2007
2:05-cv-1340-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2007)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH FERGUSON, Plaintiff, v. C. D. BROWN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Citations

2:05-cv-1340-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 23, 2007)