From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Bombardier Services Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 21, 2007
Consolidated under Case No. 8:03-cv-539-T-31DAB, Case No. 8:03-cv-544-T-31DAB, Pre-Consolidated Case Nos.: 8:03-cv-539-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1396-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-544-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1391-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-541-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1380-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-561-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1383-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-552-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1385-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-550-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1393-T-30TM, 8:03-cv-557-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1386-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-551-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1392-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-554-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1387-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-555-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-1394-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-556-T-24MAP, 8:03-cv-1395-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-542-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1390-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-559-T-30TGW, 803-cv-1384-T-30MSS (M.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2007)

Opinion

Consolidated under Case No. 8:03-cv-539-T-31DAB, Case No. 8:03-cv-544-T-31DAB, Pre-Consolidated Case Nos.: 8:03-cv-539-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1396-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-544-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1391-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-541-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1380-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-561-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1383-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-552-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1385-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-550-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1393-T-30TM, 8:03-cv-557-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1386-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-551-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1392-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-554-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1387-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-555-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-1394-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-556-T-24MAP, 8:03-cv-1395-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-542-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1390-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-559-T-30TGW, 803-cv-1384-T-30MSS.

February 21, 2007


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiffs' Objection to Bombardier Defendants' Bill of Costs and Opposition to Bombardier Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration Re: Taxation of Costs (Doc. No. 564) filed June 30, 2006 and Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendant Rockwell Collins Inc.'s Bill of Costs and Opposition to Rockwell Collins Inc.'s Motion for Reconsideration Re: Taxation of Costs filed June 30, 2006.

On January 30, 2007, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 571) recommending that the objection should be granted in part and denied in part. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. The Plaintiffs' Objections to Bombardier's and Rockwell's Bill of Costs and Oppositions to both Defendants' Motions for Reconsideration Re: Taxation of Costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

3. The Orlando Division Clerk's Office is directed to modify the award of costs and enter a Cost Judgment on behalf of to Rockwell Collins in the amount of $11,105.00 and, on behalf of Bombardier in the amount of $20,815.00 ($854.00 for Rockwell Collins and $1,061.00 to Bombardier for each of the thirteen active Plaintiffs') and thereafter CLOSE the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Bombardier Services Corporation

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Feb 21, 2007
Consolidated under Case No. 8:03-cv-539-T-31DAB, Case No. 8:03-cv-544-T-31DAB, Pre-Consolidated Case Nos.: 8:03-cv-539-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1396-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-544-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1391-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-541-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1380-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-561-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1383-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-552-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1385-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-550-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1393-T-30TM, 8:03-cv-557-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1386-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-551-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1392-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-554-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1387-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-555-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-1394-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-556-T-24MAP, 8:03-cv-1395-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-542-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1390-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-559-T-30TGW, 803-cv-1384-T-30MSS (M.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2007)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Bombardier Services Corporation

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL FERGUSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JAMES PATRICK…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Feb 21, 2007

Citations

Consolidated under Case No. 8:03-cv-539-T-31DAB, Case No. 8:03-cv-544-T-31DAB, Pre-Consolidated Case Nos.: 8:03-cv-539-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1396-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-544-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-1391-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-541-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1380-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-561-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1383-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-552-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1385-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-550-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1393-T-30TM, 8:03-cv-557-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1386-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-551-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-1392-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-554-T-30TGW, 8:03-cv-1387-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-555-T-30MAP, 8:03-cv-1394-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-556-T-24MAP, 8:03-cv-1395-T-30MSS, 8:03-cv-542-T-30TBM, 8:03-cv-1390-T-30EAJ, 8:03-cv-559-T-30TGW, 803-cv-1384-T-30MSS (M.D. Fla. Feb. 21, 2007)

Citing Cases

Monelus v. Tocodrian, Inc.

As the prevailing party alone knows the purpose of the copies, it cannot simply make unsubstantiated claims…

Monelus v. Tocodrian, Inc.

As the prevailing party alone knows the purpose of the copies, it cannot simply make unsubstantiated claims…