From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ferguson v. Acutus Med.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
3:22-cv-00388-JO-KSC (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00388-JO-KSC

04-20-2022

CLINTON A. FERGUSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. ACUTUS MEDICAL, INC, VINCE BURGESS and DAVID H. ROMAN, Defendants.


ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULING

HONORABLE JINSOOK OHTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presently before the Court is the parties' Stipulation Regarding Scheduling (the “Stipulation”) (Dkt. No. 14), by which Plaintiff Clinton A. Ferguson (“Plaintiff') and Defendants Acutus Medical, Inc., Vince Burgess, and David H. Roman (“Defendants”) seek approval of the following stipulated terms:

1. Defendants are relieved of any obligation to respond to the initial Complaint in the Action.

2. Within fourteen (14) days of entry of the Court's order appointing a lead plaintiff and lead counsel in Brown v. Acutus Medical, Inc. et al., 3:22-cv-00206-JO-KSC, such lead counsel and counsel for Defendants shall meet and confer and jointly submit a proposed schedule for the filing of a consolidated amended complaint, Defendants' response to the same, and any and all briefing associated therewith.

Having reviewed the materials submitted, the Court GRANTS the parties' Stipulation according to the stipulated terms.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ferguson v. Acutus Med.

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Apr 20, 2022
3:22-cv-00388-JO-KSC (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Ferguson v. Acutus Med.

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON A. FERGUSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Apr 20, 2022

Citations

3:22-cv-00388-JO-KSC (S.D. Cal. Apr. 20, 2022)