From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fenton v. City of Portland

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 19, 2010
Civil No. 09-1240-ST (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-1240-ST.

March 19, 2010

Norman H. Fenton, Portland, Oregon, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Terence L. Thatcher, City Attorney's Office, Portland, Oregon, Attorney for Defendant.


ORDER


The Honorable Janice Stewart, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 16, 2010. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate's Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate's report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b);McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Stewart.

This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Stewart (#15) dated February 16, 2010 in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the City's Motion to Dismiss for Want of Jurisdiction (Ripeness) (#5) is granted.


Summaries of

Fenton v. City of Portland

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Mar 19, 2010
Civil No. 09-1240-ST (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Fenton v. City of Portland

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN H. FENTON, DAVID CARNEY-FENTON, and LISA CARNEY-FENTON Plaintiffs…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Mar 19, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-1240-ST (D. Or. Mar. 19, 2010)