Fennell v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Freelove v. State

    494 S.E.2d 72 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997)   Cited 6 times

    OCGA ยง 16-7-1 (a). It is not necessary to prove that the theft of any object occurred, only that there was an apparent purpose to commit a theft. Fennell v. State, 159 Ga. App. 194, 195 ( 283 S.E.2d 72) (1981); Davis v. State, 139 Ga. App. 105, 106 (3) ( 227 S.E.2d 900) (1976). Although Freelove testified that he entered the building "to secure" it and because he was curious, the jury was the sole judge of witness credibility.

  2. Moon v. State

    431 S.E.2d 128 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 5 times

    " Parrish v. State, 141 Ga. App. 631 (1) ( 234 S.E.2d 174) (1977).' Green v. State, 158 Ga. App. 321 (1) ( 279 S.E.2d 763). See also Fennell v. State, 159 Ga. App. 194, 195 ( 283 S.E.2d 72); Loury v. State, 147 Ga. App. 152 (1) ( 248 S.E.2d 291); and Ealey v. State, 139 Ga. App. 604, 605 (2), 607 ( 229 S.E.2d 86)." McNair v. State, 190 Ga. App. 412 (1), 413 ( 379 S.E.2d 424).

  3. McNair v. State

    379 S.E.2d 424 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)   Cited 11 times

    " Green v. State, 158 Ga. App. 321 (1) ( 279 S.E.2d 763). See also Fennell v. State, 159 Ga. App. 194, 195 ( 283 S.E.2d 72); Loury v. State, 147 Ga. App. 152 (1) ( 248 S.E.2d 291); and Ealey v. State, 139 Ga. App. 604, 605 (2), 607 ( 229 S.E.2d 86). 2.