Femia v. Bayonne

Full title: JOSEPH FEMIA, RESPONDENT, v. CITY OF BAYONNE, APPELLANT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 5, 1934

170 A. 56 (N.J. 1934)

170 A. 56

112 N.J.L. 90

Opinion

Argued October 23, 1933 —

Decided January 5, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 553.

For the respondent, Hyman Brodsky.

For the appellant, Daniel J. Murray.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER. PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.