From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felter v. 217 Centre Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1972
38 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Opinion

February 14, 1972


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated July 10, 1969, which denied their motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint (CPLR 3012, subd. [b]). Order reversed, without costs, and motion granted. The motion to dismiss the action was made after close to three years had elapsed since a demand was made for service of a copy of the complaint. The complaint was served after the motion was made. No acceptable justification has been offered for such an inordinate delay. Accordingly, we think that it was an improvident exercise of discretion for the Special Term to deny the motion ( Kroner v. Flora, 35 A.D.2d 835; Welsh v. Kaskell, 33 A.D.2d 803; Kushniruk v. Gorczyca, 25 A.D.2d 615). Martuscello, Acting P.J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Felter v. 217 Centre Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 1972
38 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)
Case details for

Felter v. 217 Centre Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MARY FELTER, Respondent, v. 217 CENTRE CORP. et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 1972

Citations

38 A.D.2d 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1972)

Citing Cases

Kahn v. Samson Management Corp.

Order reversed, in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and motion granted. To justify his failure to…