Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'l Exploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'l Exploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'l Exploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'l Exploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'l Exploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'lExploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'lExploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'l Exploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'lExploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).

Courts have allowed non-hiring claims to proceed at the pleadings stage on a theory that the position remained unfilled while the employer waited for a younger qualified applicant to apply. See Fellows v. Scottsdale OP CO LLC, 2019 WL 1959931, at *2 (D. Ariz. May 2, 2019); see also Chambra v. Chevron Int'lExploration & Production, 2006 WL 2850032, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 4, 2006).