From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fellows v. Baker

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Sep 15, 2021
2:20-CV-139 (D. Vt. Sep. 15, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-139

09-15-2021

FRANK W. FELLOWS, Petitioner, v. JAMES BAKER and THOMAS J. DONOVAN, JR., Respondents.


ORDER

William K. Sessions III District Court Judge

The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed March 10, 2021. After careful review of the file and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, no objections having been filed by any party, this Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's recommendations in full for the reasons stated in the Report.

The Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 5) is GRANTED. It is further ordered that Fellows's §2255 Petition (Doc. 4) is DISMISSED and Fellows's Motion to Reconsider denial of his request for appointed counsel (Doc. 10) is DENIED as moot.

Because Fellows has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).


Summaries of

Fellows v. Baker

United States District Court, D. Vermont
Sep 15, 2021
2:20-CV-139 (D. Vt. Sep. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Fellows v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:FRANK W. FELLOWS, Petitioner, v. JAMES BAKER and THOMAS J. DONOVAN, JR.…

Court:United States District Court, D. Vermont

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

2:20-CV-139 (D. Vt. Sep. 15, 2021)

Citing Cases

Wardak v. Cavanaugh

Although the affidavit does not state the days of the week, “the court may take judicial notice of facts…