From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Jun 19, 1952
202 Misc. 611 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)

Opinion

06-19-1952

Leatrice Fellner, Respondent, v. William Zuckerberg, Appellant.


Louis Drell for appellant. Leatrice Fellner, respondent in person. HOFSTADTER and SCHREIBER, JJ., concur in Per Curiam memorandum; HECHT, J., dissents and votes for reversal of the judgment and dismissal of the complaint. Per Curiam. The defendant's employment having been terminated without fault on his part, whether the plaintiff is entitled to the return of any part of the fee paid for the conduct of the action to its conclusion, depends on the intention of the parties when the payment was made, to be determined from the receipt and all the surrounding circumstances. These issues should be explored fully. The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event. Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.
Jun 19, 1952
202 Misc. 611 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)
Case details for

Fellner v. Zuckerberg

Case Details

Full title:Leatrice Fellner, Respondent,v.William Zuckerberg, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

Date published: Jun 19, 1952

Citations

202 Misc. 611 (N.Y. App. Term 1952)