From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feliciano v. Malik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2008
57 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2008-01737.

December 23, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Mohammad Malik and Osman Jami appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated January 14, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Baker, McEvoy, Morrissey Moskovits, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Stacy R. Seldin of counsel), for appellants.

Hecht, Kleeger, Pintel Damashek, New York, N.Y. (Ephrem Wertenteil of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Miller, Dickerson and Eng, JJ. concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly found that there are triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants' motion for summary judgment ( see CPLR 3212).


Summaries of

Feliciano v. Malik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 2008
57 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Feliciano v. Malik

Case Details

Full title:JENNIFER FELICIANO, Respondent, v. MOHAMMAD MALIK et al., Appellants, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2008

Citations

57 A.D.3d 838 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 10123
868 N.Y.S.2d 917

Citing Cases

ELMONT MRI DIAG. RADIOLOGY v. STATE FARM INS.

When a doctor testifies outside his area of expertise, the party calling the doctor must lay a foundation…

All Cnty., LLC v. Tri–State Consumer Ins. Co.

The papers before the court do not state who ordered the thoracic MRI. Dr. Falvo's IME report would not be…