From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feliciano v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2003
304 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

832.

April 17, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered February 28, 2002, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants-appellants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Robert M. Fiala, for plaintiff-respondent.

Elizabeth Gelfand Kastner, for defendants-appellants.

Before: MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, FRIEDMAN, MARLOW, GONZALEZ, JJ.


Plaintiff's expert asserted that improper patching of a hole in the public sidewalk abutting defendants-appellants' premises was the proximate cause of the injuries sustained by plaintiff. Defendants-appellants' manager's deposition testimony concerning sidewalk repair procedures raises an issue of fact concerning whether defendants-appellants performed the alleged defective patch work, and are thus subject to liability (see Hausser v. Giunta, 88 N.Y.2d 449, 452-453). Accordingly, defendants-appellants' cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against them was properly denied.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Feliciano v. City of N.Y

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 17, 2003
304 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Feliciano v. City of N.Y

Case Details

Full title:HASSIE FELICIANO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 17, 2003

Citations

304 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
757 N.Y.S.2d 430

Citing Cases

CASO v. KESSLER

Thus, the attorneys have not made out their prima facie case that the plaintiff could not have prevailed in…