From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldmann v. State

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 4, 2011
2:06-CV-00218-JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2011)

Opinion

2:06-CV-00218-JCM (GWF).

February 4, 2011


ORDER


Presently before the court is plaintiff Steven W. Feldmann's motion to change venue. (Doc. #4). Defendants the State of Nevada and Metropolitan P.D. did not file an opposition.

On February 24, 2006, plaintiff made a motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis, but did not attach a complaint as required. (Doc. #1). On March 20, 2006, the court entered an order dismissing the case without prejudice, holding that the plaintiff may file a new action with both a complaint and a new application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. #2). Judgment was entered against the plaintiff on March 20, 2006. (Doc. #3).

It has been over four years since the court allowed the plaintiff to file a new action and another petition, yet he has failed to do so. In the present motion to change venue (doc. #4), plaintiff asks this court for a "change of venue" to the Western District of Texas. However, since judgment has been entered against plaintiff, the case was dismissed, and he failed to re-file a petition, the present motion is moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that plaintiff Steven W. Feldmann's motion to change venue (doc. #4) be, and the same hereby is DENIED as moot.

DATED this 4th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Feldmann v. State

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Feb 4, 2011
2:06-CV-00218-JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Feldmann v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN FELDMANN, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF NEVADA, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Feb 4, 2011

Citations

2:06-CV-00218-JCM (GWF) (D. Nev. Feb. 4, 2011)