See Crest Group Inc. v. Deloitte Touche, LLP, Nos. A06-1230, A06-1231, A07-478, 2007 WL 2769619, at *5 (Minn.App. Sept. 25, 2007) (declining to take notice of error under rule 103(d) where no error of fundamental law or plain error affecting substantial rights existed), review denied (Minn. Dec. 19, 2007); Feldmann v. Bailey, No. A03-651, 2004 WL 771429, at *7 (Minn.App. Apr. 13, 2004) (same); Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 103.04 (allowing this court to review any issue as the interests of justice may require); State v. Hannuksela, 452 N.W.2d 668, 673 n. 7 (Minn. 1990) (stating that "it is the responsibility of the appellate courts to decide cases in accordance with law and that responsibility is not to be diluted by counsel's oversights, lack of research, failure to specify issues or to cite relevant authorities" (quotation omitted)); see also Greenbush State Bank v. Stephens, 463 N.W.2d 303, 306 n. 1 (Minn.App. 1990) (applying Hannuksela in a civil case), review denied (Minn. Feb. 4, 1991).