From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldman v. South Huntington SCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 2002
290 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2001-03232

Argued January 7, 2002.

January 28, 2002.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Catterson, J.), dated March 9, 2001, which granted the plaintiffs' motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside a jury verdict in its favor as against the weight of the evidence, and for a new trial.

Devitt, Spellman, Barrett, Callahan, Leyden Kenney, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. (Sean P. Callahan and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for appellant.

Siben Siben, LLP, Bay Shore, N.Y. (Alan G. Faber and Andrew Frank of counsel), for respondents.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the entry of an appropriate judgment.

"The law is settled that a verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless the evidence preponderates so heavily in the plaintiff's favor that the verdict could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence" (Ramirez v. City of Yonkers, 272 A.D.2d 598; see also, Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, 45 N.Y.2d 493; Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129). Here, the plaintiffs did not meet this standard. The teachers, who were supervising the infant plaintiff and approximately 19 other seven-year-old children while they played at a playground, testified that they told the children every day to stay away from the bushes. The infant plaintiff failed to heed those warnings and was injured by a piece of glass when he hid behind a bush during a game of hide and seek. While the infant plaintiff denied ever being told to stay away from the bushes, this merely created a factual dispute for the jury to resolve.

ALTMAN, J.P., FEUERSTEIN, O'BRIEN and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Feldman v. South Huntington SCH

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 28, 2002
290 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Feldman v. South Huntington SCH

Case Details

Full title:JACOB DOUGLAS FELDMAN, ETC., ET AL., respondents, v. SOUTH HUNTINGTON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 28, 2002

Citations

290 A.D.2d 529 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
736 N.Y.S.2d 607

Citing Cases

McDonald v. Colonial Steel Corp.

In making its determination, the court must evaluate the evidence in the record in the light most favorable…

Colucci v. Cathedral

A motion for judgment as a matter of law may only be granted where there is "no valid line of reasoning and…