From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldman v. L. A. Cnty. Sheriff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 1, 2015
2:06-cv-00178-RCJ-LRL (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2015)

Opinion

2:06-cv-00178-RCJ-LRL

06-01-2015

STEVEN W. FELDMAN, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge closed this case in 2006 when Plaintiff failed to include an address or telephone number with his motion to proceed in forma pauperis or his proposed complaint. Plaintiff has now filed a motion requesting no particular relief, and which is largely incomprehensible.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion (ECF No. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 1, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Feldman v. L. A. Cnty. Sheriff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jun 1, 2015
2:06-cv-00178-RCJ-LRL (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2015)
Case details for

Feldman v. L. A. Cnty. Sheriff

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN W. FELDMAN, Plaintiff, v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 1, 2015

Citations

2:06-cv-00178-RCJ-LRL (D. Nev. Jun. 1, 2015)