Opinion
May 7, 1925.
Deiches, Goldwater Flynn [ Monroe Goldwater of counsel], for the appellant.
J. Arthur Hilton, for the respondent.
It was prejudicial to the rights of appellant for the trial court to state to the jury after passing upon a request to charge "You can take your exception and any other exception you want to. It won't do you much good." Because of this, the judgment entered upon the verdict rendered in favor of the respondent must be reversed and a new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to the appellant to abide the event.
All concur.