From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feldman v. Kings Highway Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 6, 1951
303 N.Y. 675 (N.Y. 1951)

Opinion

Submitted October 9, 1951

Decided December 6, 1951

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, PETTE, J.

Francis J. Hughes for appellant.

William R. Bayes and James Morrow for respondent.

John J. Redfield, Curtis S. Bates, and Henry A. Mark for The Bowery Savings Bank and others, amici curiae, in support of respondent's position.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, CONWAY, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ.


Summaries of

Feldman v. Kings Highway Savings Bank

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 6, 1951
303 N.Y. 675 (N.Y. 1951)
Case details for

Feldman v. Kings Highway Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL FELDMAN, Appellant, v. KINGS HIGHWAY SAVINGS BANK, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 6, 1951

Citations

303 N.Y. 675 (N.Y. 1951)
102 N.E.2d 835

Citing Cases

Band Realty v. N. Brewster

" The traditional method which has been used by the courts was summarized by the Appellate Division in…

Russo Enterprises, Inc. v. Citibank, N.A.

As the mortgage documents did not grant Russo an unambiguous right to prepay the debt (see, Matter of Arthur…