From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 25, 2003
853 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-4410.

Opinion filed June 25, 2003.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; James I. Cohn, Judge; L.T. Case No. 98-19731 CF10A.

David L. Felder, Florida City, pro se.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marrett W. Hanna, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of an order denying his rule 3.850 motion as successive. We disagree with the state's contention that appellant's earlier motion, styled by him as a motion for post conviction relief and reviewed at the state's urging as a motion to correct illegal sentence, made his second motion for post conviction relief successive. The state argues that, since he failed to allege his new grounds for relief were unknown and could not have been discovered at the time of his earlier motion, the motion was properly denied. Appellant's earlier motion, having been treated and reviewed as a 3.800(a) motion, raised claims concerning the legality of his sentencing. His present motion raises an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a claim we feel, given the circumstances of this case, warrants review by the trial court on the merits. See Ramirez v. State, 822 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Felder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 25, 2003
853 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Felder v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID L. FELDER, Appellant v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 25, 2003

Citations

853 So. 2d 473 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Grier v. State

The postconviction motion was not successive as appellant's prior motions were filed under rule 3.800(a) and…