From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Felder v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0903 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0903 LKK EFB P.

November 16, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He has requested that the court appoint counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). The court may appointment counsel at any stage of the proceedings "if the interests of justice so require." See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also, Rule 8(c), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. The court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at this stage of the proceedings.

Accordingly, it hereby is ORDERED that petitioner's November 13, 2007, motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Felder v. Carey

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 16, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0903 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Felder v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LEE FELDER, Petitioner, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0903 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Nov. 16, 2007)