From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fekada v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 2003
Civil Action No. 02-8182 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2003)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 02-8182

February 12, 2003


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Presently before the Court is a Motion to Reconsider and Amend Judgment filed by Petitioner Fassil Fekada ("Fekada"), which challenges the legal sufficiency of this Court's December 17, 2002 Order affirming the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") decision to deny Fekada relief from removal. Fekada contends that the underlying BIA decision requires Fekada be removed from the United States, but fails to identify a country for removal. Fekada requests that this Court remand the matter to the BIA for an appropriate order designating a country for removal or, in the alternative, that this Court designate a country for removal.

Fekada was admitted to the United States as an Ethiopian refugee and, as such, may never be recognized as a citizen, or accepted, by that country. Potential alternative countries for removal include Sudan, through which Fekada's family traveled immediately prior to his arrival in the United States, or Eritrea, a country that became independent in 1993 from territory that was previously Ethiopia. (Pet.'s Mot. to Recons. and Amend Jmt. at 2.)

In support of his legal assertion, Fekada contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1229a requires the designation of a country for removal. This Court's review of that statute, however, has not revealed any provision specifically requiring such a country designation, lest a removal order be rendered fatal without it. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a.

Nevertheless, the Government has not responded to Fekada's motion despite an indication that service had been effected by Fekada. Since the Government has failed to file a timely response, the Court will grant Fekada's motion as uncontested pursuant to Rule 7.1(c) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. E.D. Pa. R.Civ.P. 7.1(c).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Fekada's Motion to Reconsider and Amend Judgment (Doc. No. 8), to which no response has been filed by the Government, is GRANTED AS UNCONTESTED, and this matter shall be REMANDED to the BIA for designation of an appropriate country for Fekada's removal.


Summaries of

Fekada v. Ashcroft

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 12, 2003
Civil Action No. 02-8182 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2003)
Case details for

Fekada v. Ashcroft

Case Details

Full title:FASSIL FEKADA, Petitioner, v. JOHN ASHCROFT, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 12, 2003

Citations

Civil Action No. 02-8182 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 12, 2003)