From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 24, 2003
353 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

No. 02-17236.

Argued and Submitted December 5, 2003.

Filed December 24, 2003.

Solomon B. Cera, Gold Bennett Cera Sidener LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the Plaintiff-Appellant.

Jonathan C. Dickey, Gibson, Dunn Crutcher LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for the Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-02-03072-MHP.

Before BRIGHT, D.W. NELSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Honorable Myron H. Bright, Senior United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.


ORDER


We affirm for reasons stated by the district court in its opinion, Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch Co., Inc., 234 F.Supp.2d 1043 (N.D.Cal. 2002).

We deny Feitelberg's Request for Judicial Notice and Merrill Lynch's request for sanctions.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 24, 2003
353 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2003)
Case details for

Feitelberg v. Merrill Lynch Co.

Case Details

Full title:Jerome FEITELBERG, On Behalf of Himself, All Others Similarly Situated…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 24, 2003

Citations

353 F.3d 765 (9th Cir. 2003)