From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feisthamel v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 2, 1982
440 N.E.2d 534 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided September 2, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, JOHN R. TENNEY, J.

Frederick Feisthamel and Francis Byron, appellants pro se. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General ( William J. Kogan of counsel), for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, without costs. Even if the arbitrator refused to hear evidence of petitioners' character or their service record, such refusal was not misconduct, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 84 A.D.2d 960).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER. Taking no part: Judge GABRIELLI.


Summaries of

Feisthamel v. State of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 2, 1982
440 N.E.2d 534 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

Feisthamel v. State of New York

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK FEISTHAMEL et al., Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK (DEPARTMENT…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 2, 1982

Citations

440 N.E.2d 534 (N.Y. 1982)
440 N.E.2d 534
454 N.Y.S.2d 534

Citing Cases

Matter of Smith v. Suffolk Cty. Police Dept

Finally, even assuming, arguendo, that such contradictions did exist, they went only to the credibility of…