Opinion
No. 06-05-00004-CV
Submitted: April 12, 2005.
Decided: April 13, 2005.
On Appeal from the 58th Judicial District Court, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Court No. a-168,650.
Before MORRISS, C.J., ROSS and CARTER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Herbert Feist, pro se, has appealed from a judgment of the 58th Judicial District Court in which it granted the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' plea to the jurisdiction. The trial court dismissed the claims against the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals with prejudice and imposed monetary sanctions against the plaintiff. The judgment does not purport to in any way affect the suit filed by Feist against the 252nd Judicial District Court or the district clerk.
The Texas Constitution vests jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments of district and county courts in the courts of appeals, subject to restrictions and regulations prescribed by law. TEX. CONST. ART. V, § 6. The Texas Supreme Court held in N.E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966), that "an appeal may be prosecuted only from a final judgment and . . . to be final a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in a case." Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps, 842 S.W.2d 266, 268 (Tex. 1992). The judgment does not dispose of all parties. The clerk's record has been filed, and it contains nothing that would suggest that the remaining parties have been disposed of by any means. The judgment is not final, and we have no jurisdiction over the appeal.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.