holding that section 3624(c) does not create a liberty interest because it refers to no mandatory procedures and does not provide "'specified substantive predicates' which dictate a substantive result"
Summary of this case from Fox v. LappinNos. 99-1348, 99-1349.
May 10, 2000.
E.D.Pa.
Affirmed
holding that section 3624(c) does not create a liberty interest because it refers to no mandatory procedures and does not provide "'specified substantive predicates' which dictate a substantive result"
Summary of this case from Fox v. LappinFull title:Feist v. Consolidated Freightways Corp
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Date published: May 10, 2000
However, nothing in § 3624(c) compels pre-release confinement in a CCC. The statute requires only that…
Moser v. Dillon Invs.Id. at 306 (citing Feist v. Consol. Freightways Corp. , 100 F. Supp. 2d 273, 274–75 (E.D. Pa. 1999), aff'd ,…