From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feinsot v. Burstein

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1915
108 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1915)

Opinion

Argued January 4, 1915

Decided January 19, 1915

Charles Goldzier, Louis J. Vorhaus, Gerald B. Rosenheim and Charles Burstein for appellant.

Herman B. Goodstein for respondents.


Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, COLLIN, HOGAN, MILLER and CARDOZO, JJ. Dissenting: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., and CHASE, J.


Summaries of

Feinsot v. Burstein

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 19, 1915
108 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1915)
Case details for

Feinsot v. Burstein

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS FEINSOT et al., Respondents, v . MAURICE J. BURSTEIN, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 19, 1915

Citations

108 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1915)
108 N.E. 1093

Citing Cases

Tepper v. Minsker Realty Co., Inc.

ipso facto put an end to the term, the premises never became vacant "during the said term." The conditions…

Stimpson v. Minsker Realty Co.

These words, or their equivalent, were found in the lease under consideration in Feyer v. Reiss ( 154 App.…