From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Feezor v. Staples, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-01930-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-01930-MCE-KJN

09-28-2011

LARY FEEZOR Plaintiff, v. STAPLES, INC. dba STAPLES #0442; KMV PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendants.


Assigned to the Hon. Morrison C.

England, Jr.;

Courtroom 7

ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO

INITIAL COMPLAINT BY NOT MORE THAN TWENTY-EIGHT (28) DAYS

Having considered the Parties' Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Initial Complaint by an Additional Twenty-Eight (28) Days, and having found it to be supported by good cause, it is hereby ORDERED that STAPLES, INC. dba STAPLES # 0442, shall have an additional extension of twenty-eight (28) days to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.

, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Feezor v. Staples, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 28, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-01930-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Feezor v. Staples, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LARY FEEZOR Plaintiff, v. STAPLES, INC. dba STAPLES #0442; KMV PROPERTIES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 28, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-01930-MCE-KJN (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2011)