From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federico v. Overland Contracting, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 7, 2013
No. C12-2588 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)

Opinion

No. C12-2588 MEJ

05-07-2013

LEE FEDERICO, Plaintiff, v. OVERLAND CONTRACTING, INC., et al., Defendants.


SECOND ORDER RE: CASE STATUS

On March 26, 2013, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer and thereafter file a joint status report by April 11, 2013. Dkt. No. 25. The Court requested that the parties' statement address topics including a report as to whether the Court should continue pretrial and trial deadlines, including dispositive motions, and whether it would be beneficial for the parties to participate in a settlement conference with another magistrate judge. As the parties have failed to file a report, the Court again ORDERS the parties to file a status report with this information by May 16, 2013. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________

Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Federico v. Overland Contracting, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
May 7, 2013
No. C12-2588 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Federico v. Overland Contracting, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LEE FEDERICO, Plaintiff, v. OVERLAND CONTRACTING, INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: May 7, 2013

Citations

No. C12-2588 MEJ (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2013)