From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Ex. v. Pub. Utility

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 27, 2006
Case No. C04-5052 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. C04-5052 RBL.

February 27, 2006


ORDER


The Court continues to believe that the evidence supports its conclusion that the District owns 100% of the Swift #2 facility and insured 100% of the potential power loss which might occur as a result of an insured event. The fact that the District combines its power generation with Pacific Corp. and that its portion of the combined power output is 26% does not mean that the District has an insurable interest in only 26% of the damaged facility or the power produced by that facility. The District owned 100% of Swift #2, contributed 100% of the power generated from Swift #2 and insured 100% of that power against loss from an insurable event. The District is entitled to reimbursement of that total loss up to applicable sub-limits.

Plaintiffs' motion [Dkt. #223] is DENIED.


Summaries of

Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Ex. v. Pub. Utility

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
Feb 27, 2006
Case No. C04-5052 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Federated Rural Elec. Ins. Ex. v. Pub. Utility

Case Details

Full title:FEDERATED RURAL ELECTRIC INSURANCE EXCHANGE and TIG INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: Feb 27, 2006

Citations

Case No. C04-5052 RBL (W.D. Wash. Feb. 27, 2006)