From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan. v. Jungbluth

Supreme Court of New Mexico
May 27, 1936
58 P.2d 1203 (N.M. 1936)

Opinion

No. 4207.

May 27, 1936.

Appeal from District Court, Union County; Livingston N. Taylor, Judge.

W.E. Pepperell and John B. Tittmann, both of Wichita, Kan., and O.P. Easterwood, of Clayton, for appellant.


The appellant herein asked for a deficiency judgment in a foreclosure suit on a note and mortgage executed by appellees. The final judgment and decree was entered when appellees failed to appear or plead to the foreclosure suit brought by appellant. The judgment was for $8,322.81, with interest, and was in all respects regularly entered. It provided for a personal and deficiency judgment after the application of the proceeds from the sale of the mortgaged land. The sale was regularly advertised by the special master designated for that purpose. The land sold for $6,500, leaving a deficiency in the sum of $2,151.25, which amount the trial court refused to allow. From this order of disallowance, this appeal is prosecuted.

Without any evidence in the record to support the action of the trial court, the disallowance was arbitrary. Nothing more need be added to this opinion.

For the reasons given, the cause will be remanded to the district court, with directions to confirm the report of the special master and to allow a deficiency and personal judgment against the appellees here, the defendants below, in the sum of $2,151.25 as shown by said report.

It is so ordered.

HUDSPETH and BRICE, JJ., concur.

SADLER, C.J., and BICKLEY, J., did not participate.


Summaries of

Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan. v. Jungbluth

Supreme Court of New Mexico
May 27, 1936
58 P.2d 1203 (N.M. 1936)
Case details for

Federal Land Bank of Wichita, Kan. v. Jungbluth

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL LAND BANK OF WICHITA, KAN., v. JUNGBLUTH ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of New Mexico

Date published: May 27, 1936

Citations

58 P.2d 1203 (N.M. 1936)
58 P.2d 1203

Citing Cases

The Springer Group, Inc. v. Wittelsohn

According to our Supreme Court, disallowing a deficiency judgment without any evidence in the record to…