From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Insurance Company v. Hansen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1990
162 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 14, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lucille Polk Buell, J.).


As should have been clear from the complaint, plaintiff subrogee seeks to recover amounts paid by it to its insured under the additional personal injury protection indorsement of the insured's policy. Accordingly, the claim is not barred by Insurance Law § 5105 (b). Insurance Law § 5105 (b) requires arbitration of claims between insurers for first-party benefits. It has no application where, as here, the claim is for amounts paid by the insurer for additional personal injury protection, i.e., amounts in excess of first-party benefits (see, Aetna Cas. Sur. Co. v. Jackowe, 96 A.D.2d 37; Fowler v. Pebble Hill Bldg. Corp., 120 A.D.2d 486; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. La Forte, 125 A.D.2d 563).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Rosenberger, Asch, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Federal Insurance Company v. Hansen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 14, 1990
162 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Federal Insurance Company v. Hansen

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of ANTHONY CAPRARO, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 14, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 224 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
556 N.Y.S.2d 592

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Karpen

Before: PRESENT: RUDOLPH, P.J., McCABE and COVELLO, JJ. As subrogee, plaintiff commenced this action on or…

Matter of Brinks, Inc. v. Commercial Un. Ins. Co.

Consequently, the submission of the appellant's claim to arbitration was timely as it related back to the…