From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Federal Financial v. Lauria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

February 5, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly granted (see, CPLR 3212; Ehrlich v. American Moninger Greenhouse Mfg. Corp., 26 N.Y.2d 255). The affidavit of the plaintiff's managing partner was sufficient to establish that the defendant did not repay the subject loan.

Moreover, the award of attorneys' fees, as provided for in the promissory note, was reasonable. Bracken, J.P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Federal Financial v. Lauria

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 5, 1996
224 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Federal Financial v. Lauria

Case Details

Full title:FEDERAL FINANCIAL, Respondent, v. MARK LAURIA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1996

Citations

224 A.D.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
638 N.Y.S.2d 317