Federal Discount Co. v. Gault Bros

1 Citing case

  1. Hatcher v. Roberson

    164 P. 1141 (Okla. 1917)   Cited 5 times

    Rule 25 (38 Okla. x, 137 Pac. xi) requires that the brief of plaintiff in error shall contain, in addition to the specifications of error complained of, the argument and authorities in support of each point relied on. Where this rule is not complied with, the judgment appealed from will be affirmed. King et al. v. King, 42 Okla. 405, 141 P. 788; Federal Discount Co. v. Gault Bros., 42 Okla. 630, 142 P. 300. The foregoing authorities are supported by a long line of decisions of this court.